<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Brownites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://parliamentarynews.co.uk/the-reds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://parliamentarynews.co.uk</link>
	<description>Politics with Personality</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:54:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Despisers of Democracy &#171; ParliamentaryNews</title>
		<link>http://parliamentarynews.co.uk/the-reds/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Despisers of Democracy &#171; ParliamentaryNews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 08:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parliamentarynews.co.uk/?page_id=19#comment-154</guid>
		<description>[...] The&#160;Brownites [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The&nbsp;Brownites [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: (It’s not all) Doom and Gloom in the Heartlands &#171; ParliamentaryNews</title>
		<link>http://parliamentarynews.co.uk/the-reds/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>(It’s not all) Doom and Gloom in the Heartlands &#171; ParliamentaryNews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parliamentarynews.co.uk/?page_id=19#comment-67</guid>
		<description>[...] The&#160;Brownites [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The&nbsp;Brownites [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labour&#8217;s Uphill Struggle &#171; ParliamentaryNews</title>
		<link>http://parliamentarynews.co.uk/the-reds/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Labour&#8217;s Uphill Struggle &#171; ParliamentaryNews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parliamentarynews.co.uk/?page_id=19#comment-53</guid>
		<description>[...] The&#160;Brownites [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The&nbsp;Brownites [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Laborsome Party &#171; ParliamentaryNews</title>
		<link>http://parliamentarynews.co.uk/the-reds/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>The Laborsome Party &#171; ParliamentaryNews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parliamentarynews.co.uk/?page_id=19#comment-45</guid>
		<description>[...] The&#160;Brownites [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The&nbsp;Brownites [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Connor</title>
		<link>http://parliamentarynews.co.uk/the-reds/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parliamentarynews.co.uk/?page_id=19#comment-14</guid>
		<description>no I was referring to the term militant not in the sense that the Labour Party was &quot;militant&quot; but to the faction Militant (an openly Communist group) who infiltrated the Labour Party during the eighties in attempt to further radicalise, and yes Communist policies can be described as &#039;radical&#039; in terms of their placement on the left spectrum, the Labour Party. They nearly succeded because the Labour Party was in a state of dissaray and a few loonies managed to get near the leadership of the Party and start harping on about the &quot;working classes&quot;. Yes you can develop policies which increase social mobility but lets not start suggesting that the Labour Party should now start focussing on the working classes in pursuit of electoral victory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no I was referring to the term militant not in the sense that the Labour Party was &#8220;militant&#8221; but to the faction Militant (an openly Communist group) who infiltrated the Labour Party during the eighties in attempt to further radicalise, and yes Communist policies can be described as &#8216;radical&#8217; in terms of their placement on the left spectrum, the Labour Party. They nearly succeded because the Labour Party was in a state of dissaray and a few loonies managed to get near the leadership of the Party and start harping on about the &#8220;working classes&#8221;. Yes you can develop policies which increase social mobility but lets not start suggesting that the Labour Party should now start focussing on the working classes in pursuit of electoral victory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
